Same
Is Obama Using The Very Same ‘Politics of Fear’ That He Once Criticized?
Ryan Mauro writes today:
Goodbye, grim warnings about terrorism. Hello, grim warnings about the economy.
President Obama frequently railed against the Bush-era “politics of fear” on the campaign trail. In his inaugural address, he said, “We got here because we have chosen hope over fear.” President Obama also earlier made the comment in March 2008 that “we need to break the politics of fear that uses 9/11 to scare up votes.” This offensive, below-the-belt criticism insinuated that his opposition didn’t see 9/11 in the context of blood and misery, but in the context of check marks next to their names on Election Day.
But he has had no trouble issuing fear-inducing warnings himself. President Obama has simply exchanged his predecessor’s fear-inducing rhetoric on national security for fear-inducing rhetoric on the economy. When warning what would happen if his stimulus package was not passed, President Obama said that the economy would suffer a “catastrophe” and that “our nation will sink deeper into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse.”
Being lectured by President Obama on rejecting the “politics of fear” is about as valuable as receiving a lecture from Chris Brown on having patience with women. This hypocrisy has transformed his past statements into prepackaged attack ads, examples of the type of doublespeak that The Daily Show and The Colbert Report should (but won’t) lampoon.
Apparently not viewing political discourse influenced by overseas threats as legitimate, the Obama administration is introducing a new, meaningless, vague lexicon to discuss its equally meaningless and vague foreign policy strategy. The guiding philosophy of the administration appears to be that its primary concern is threat-causing fears and not fear-causing threats.
* * *
Do you think that Obama is using the same ‘Politics of Fear’ that he once criticized?
Related Reading:
American Government and Politics Today: The Essentials 2009 - 2010 Edition (American Government & Politics Today: The Essentials)AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS TODAY: THE ESSENTIALS 2009-2010 EDITION inspires readers to join the exciting process of being active, informed citiz... Read More >
Filed under Attack Ad FAQ by admin
We’re currently being treated to that here in IOWA, by Mitt Romney. (To see how, right-click on link and “Open in New Window” that you can easily close afterward. (Because the site’s “Back” button doesn’t always work.) Hassle-free.) —http://pro-christian.blogspot.com/2007/1…
Related Reading:
American Government and Politics Today: The Essentials 2009 - 2010 Edition (American Government & Politics Today: The Essentials)AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS TODAY: THE ESSENTIALS 2009-2010 EDITION inspires readers to join the exciting process of being active, informed citiz... Read More >
Filed under Attack Ad FAQ by admin
McSame old Washington politician. McCain. Same old Washingtin ways. Attack Ads. Slime & Smears……
Related Reading:
In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns (Studies in Communication, Media, and Public Opinion)Americans tend to see negative campaign ads as just that: negative. Pundits, journalists, voters, and scholars frequently complain that such ads under... Read More >
Filed under Political Attack Ads by admin





Recent Comments